Comparison
Rhubarb vs Perrier
Overall, Perrier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rhubarb | Perrier |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Perrier has 94% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 18 kcal).
- Perrier has no sugar, while Rhubarb has 3.9 g.
Ingredients
Rhubarb
PRESSED JUICES: APPLE (48%), PRESSED RHUBARB (2%); SPARKLING WATER, NATURAL FLAVOURING. ANTIOXIDANT: ASCORBIC ACID,
Perrier
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rhubarb or Perrier?
Overall, Perrier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Perrier has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Perrier has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.