Comparison
Red Wine vs Cabernet-Syrah 2014
Overall, Cabernet-Syrah 2014 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red Wine | Cabernet-Syrah 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 87 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cabernet-Syrah 2014 has 87% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 87 kcal).
- Only Cabernet-Syrah 2014 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Red Wine
wine, sulfur dioxide
Cabernet-Syrah 2014
Vin rouge (_sulfites_).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red Wine or Cabernet-Syrah 2014?
Overall, Cabernet-Syrah 2014 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cabernet-Syrah 2014 has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 87 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Wine has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.