Red Leicester Cheess vs Red Leicester
Overall, Red Leicester Cheess has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red Leicester Cheess | Red Leicester |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 403 kcal |
| Fat | 33.7 g | 33.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 21.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Leicester Cheess has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Red Leicester Cheess
gredients red leicester cheese (milk), colour: innatto norbixin, illergy advice typi ene fat
Red Leicester
milk, annatto norbixin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red Leicester Cheess or Red Leicester?
Overall, Red Leicester Cheess has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Leicester has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Leicester has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.