Red Bull Energy Drink vs 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger
Overall, 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Red Bull Energy Drink | 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.8 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has 55% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 44 kcal).
- 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has 59% less sugar (4.4 g vs 10.8 g).
- 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Red Bull Energy Drink
Carbonated water, sugar, glucose fructose, citric acid, taurine, sodium bicarbonate, magnesium carbonate, caffeine, niacin, pantothenate, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, artificial flavour, colour
1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger
Eau gazéifiée, sucre, acidifiant: acide citrique, taurine (0,4%), correcteur d'acidité: citrate trisodique, arôme, colorant: caramel ordinaire, caféine (0,02%), inositol, glucuronolactone, conservateurs : benzoate de sodium et sorbate de potassium, édulcorant: sucralose, vitamines : niacine (B3), acide pantothénique (B5), vitamines B6 et B12.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red Bull Energy Drink or 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger?
Overall, 1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
1,5L Energy Crazy Tiger has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 10.8 g per 100 g.