Raza frisona hamburguesa vacuno vs Touch of taste vasikkafondi
Overall, Touch of taste vasikkafondi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Raza frisona hamburguesa vac... | Touch of taste vasikkafondi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 201 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has 99% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 201 kcal).
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has 96% less fat (0.5 g vs 14 g).
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.5 g).
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has 53% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Raza frisona hamburguesa vacuno has 97% more protein (18 g vs 0.5 g).
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Raza frisona hamburguesa vacuno
95% carne de vacuno, agua, sal, antioxidantes: lactato Sódico, ascorbato sódico, citratos de sodio, corrector de acidez: acetato sódico, aroma natural Producto sin gluten ni lactosa (contenido de lactosa: ,lt,0,01%),
Touch of taste vasikkafondi
Moerad potatisstärkelse, syra: mjölksyra, konservering GREDIENSER: Vatten, salt, arom, köttextrakt, tomat kanc sorbat Salthalt i utspädd fond är 0,7 %. ARESOSAT: Vesi, suola, aromi, lihauute, tomaatti vasikant caatti. Laimennetun fondin suolapitoisuus on unatärkkelys, happo: maitohappo, sairas EDIENSER: Vand, salt, aroma, kødekstrakt ouillon kalvebuljong, modificeret elpotetstivelse, syre mælkesyre, dde katumsorbat PACKNING FORVARASI KYLSKAP yndet utspedd fond er 0,7 % EVARES KOLESKAB KAPLESKAR 5271-10 mle
FAQ
Which is healthier: Raza frisona hamburguesa vacuno or Touch of taste vasikkafondi?
Overall, Touch of taste vasikkafondi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Touch of taste vasikkafondi has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 201 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Touch of taste vasikkafondi has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.