Paupiettes de veau forestière vs Touch of taste vasikkafondi
Overall, Touch of taste vasikkafondi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paupiettes de veau forestièr... | Touch of taste vasikkafondi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 152 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has 99% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 152 kcal).
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8 g).
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 3.4 g).
- Touch of taste vasikkafondi has 41% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Paupiettes de veau forestière has 97% more protein (16.5 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Paupiettes de veau forestière
55,5% viande de veau (Origine: France), 23% viande de porc (Origine: France), 7,5% poitrine de porc fumée (poitrine de porc (Origine France), sel, dextrose,
Touch of taste vasikkafondi
Moerad potatisstärkelse, syra: mjölksyra, konservering GREDIENSER: Vatten, salt, arom, köttextrakt, tomat kanc sorbat Salthalt i utspädd fond är 0,7 %. ARESOSAT: Vesi, suola, aromi, lihauute, tomaatti vasikant caatti. Laimennetun fondin suolapitoisuus on unatärkkelys, happo: maitohappo, sairas EDIENSER: Vand, salt, aroma, kødekstrakt ouillon kalvebuljong, modificeret elpotetstivelse, syre mælkesyre, dde katumsorbat PACKNING FORVARASI KYLSKAP yndet utspedd fond er 0,7 % EVARES KOLESKAB KAPLESKAR 5271-10 mle
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paupiettes de veau forestière or Touch of taste vasikkafondi?
Overall, Touch of taste vasikkafondi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Touch of taste vasikkafondi has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 152 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Touch of taste vasikkafondi has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.