Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani vs Crema De Tomate Puro Verde
Overall, Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani
Crema De Tomate Puro Verde
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ravioli Fresco Carne Giulian... | Crema De Tomate Puro Verde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 293 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 4.3 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.9 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has 99% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 293 kcal).
- Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has no fat, while Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani has 4.3 g.
- Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has no saturated fat, while Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani has 2 g.
- Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has no sugar, while Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani has 3 g.
- Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has no salt, while Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani has 0.9 g.
- Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani has 49% more fiber (6.9 g vs 3.5 g).
- Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani has 99% more protein (13 g vs 0.2 g).
- Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani
Not available.
Crema De Tomate Puro Verde
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ravioli Fresco Carne Giuliani or Crema De Tomate Puro Verde?
Overall, Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crema De Tomate Puro Verde has less sugar: 0 g versus 3 g per 100 g.