Comparison

Raspberries vs Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil

Overall, Raspberries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRaspberriesNaturel Coconut Cooking Oil
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 31 kcal 840 kcal
Fat 0 g 93.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 86.7 g
Sugars 4.6 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.5 g 0 g
Protein 1.4 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Raspberries has 96% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 840 kcal).
  • Raspberries has no fat, while Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil has 93.3 g.
  • Raspberries has no saturated fat, while Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil has 86.7 g.
  • Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil has no sugar, while Raspberries has 4.6 g.
  • Raspberries has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Raspberries has 100% more protein (1.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Raspberries has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Raspberries

Raspberries.

Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Raspberries or Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil?

Overall, Raspberries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Raspberries has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 840 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons