Raspberries vs Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil
Overall, Raspberries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Raspberries | Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 840 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 93.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 86.7 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Raspberries has 96% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 840 kcal).
- Raspberries has no fat, while Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil has 93.3 g.
- Raspberries has no saturated fat, while Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil has 86.7 g.
- Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil has no sugar, while Raspberries has 4.6 g.
- Raspberries has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Raspberries has 100% more protein (1.4 g vs 0 g).
- Raspberries has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Raspberries
Raspberries.
Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Raspberries or Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil?
Overall, Raspberries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Raspberries has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 840 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Naturel Coconut Cooking Oil has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.