Raclette Gourmande vs Fromage fumé de chèvre et raclette de Savoie
Overall, Raclette Gourmande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Raclette Gourmande
Fromage fumé de chèvre et raclette de Savoie
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Raclette Gourmande | Fromage fumé de chèvre et ra... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 326 kcal | 367 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Raclette Gourmande has 11% fewer calories (326 kcal vs 367 kcal).
- Raclette Gourmande has 15% less saturated fat (17 g vs 20 g).
- Raclette Gourmande has 24% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Fromage fumé de chèvre et raclette de Savoie has 12% more protein (25 g vs 22 g).
- Only Fromage fumé de chèvre et raclette de Savoie lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Raclette Gourmande
Lait, sel, ferment lactique
Fromage fumé de chèvre et raclette de Savoie
Fromages fumé : LAIT Origine France, ferments, conservateur : LÝSOZYME D'EUF, présure, sel. RACLETTE DE Savoie : certifié par Certipaq. Fromage de chèvre : Fromage au lait pasteurisé, fabriqué en France. Ingrédients : LAIT de chèvre Origine U.E., sel, ferments, présure, conservateurs : LYSOZYME D'ŒUF, natamycine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Raclette Gourmande or Fromage fumé de chèvre et raclette de Savoie?
Overall, Raclette Gourmande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Raclette Gourmande has fewer calories: 326 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Raclette Gourmande has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.