Comparison

Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière vs Quenelle de volaille sauce champignon

Overall, Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientQuenelles de volaille sauce...Quenelle de volaille sauce c...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 114 kcal 139 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 8.7 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 5.3 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.8 g —
Protein 3.3 g 3.5 g
Additives20
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière has 18% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 139 kcal).
  • Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière has 21% less fat (6.9 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière has 49% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Only Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière

Eau, quenelles 36% (farine de BLE, graisse de porc, eau, OEUFS frais 4.5%, viande de dinde 4%, sel, arôme), crème (dont LAIT, stabilisant (carraghénanes)), champignons forestiers 2.5% (lactaires, bolets, girolles), amidons modifiés, arômes naturels, farine de BLÉ, plantes aromatiques, sirop de glucose, sel, huile de tournesol

Quenelle de volaille sauce champignon

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière or Quenelle de volaille sauce champignon?

Overall, Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Quenelles de volaille sauce forestière has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons