Purée de piment chili rouge vs Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment rouge farcis
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Purée de piment chili rouge | Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 145 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 12.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 5.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 4.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Purée de piment chili rouge has 48% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 145 kcal).
- Purée de piment chili rouge has 90% less fat (1.2 g vs 12.1 g).
- Purée de piment chili rouge has 95% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 5.6 g).
- Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment rouge farcis has 59% less sugar (2.6 g vs 6.4 g).
- Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment rouge farcis has 51% less salt (2.5 g vs 5.1 g).
- Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment rouge farcis has 57% more protein (4.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment rouge farcis lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Purée de piment chili rouge
Not available.
Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment rouge farcis
Fromage frais (33%), piments (32%), huile de colza, concentré de tomates, épices, herbes aromatiques, amidon, sel, conservateur : E211, acidifiant : acide lactique, acide citrique, acide acétique, affermissant : chlorure de calcium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Purée de piment chili rouge or Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment rouge farcis?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Purée de piment chili rouge has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gefüllte Pepperoni - Piment rouge farcis has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.