Comparison

Pršut z pečeně vs Fuet extra

Overall, Pršut z pečeně has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPršut z pečeněFuet extra
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 373 kcal 432 kcal
Fat 27.9 g 34 g
Saturated fat 9.4 g 9.7 g
Sugars 1.9 g 1.8 g
Salt 4.8 g 4.8 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 27.4 g 29 g
Additives21
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pršut z pečeně has 14% fewer calories (373 kcal vs 432 kcal).
  • Pršut z pečeně has 18% less fat (27.9 g vs 34 g).
  • Pršut z pečeně is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Fuet extra lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Pršut z pečeně

Vepřová pečeně bez kosti; dusitanová solící směs (jedlá sůl, dusitan sodný); dusičnanová solící směs (jedlá sůl, dusičnan sodný); směs koření; cukr.

Fuet extra

Vepřové maso, laktóza, jedlá sůl, sušené mléko, anitoxidant (askorban sodný); konzervant (dusitan sodný), jedlé střívko

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pršut z pečeně or Fuet extra?

Overall, Pršut z pečeně has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pršut z pečeně has fewer calories: 373 kcal versus 432 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fuet extra has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons