Proteína de guisante texturizado eco vs Erbsenprotein Schnetzel
Overall, Proteína de guisante texturizado eco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Proteína de guisante texturizado eco
Erbsenprotein Schnetzel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Proteína de guisante texturi... | Erbsenprotein Schnetzel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 360 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 5.1 g | 5.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 20 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 55 g | 63 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Erbsenprotein Schnetzel has 38% less sugar (2.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Proteína de guisante texturizado eco has no salt, while Erbsenprotein Schnetzel has 1.3 g.
- Proteína de guisante texturizado eco has 55% more fiber (20 g vs 9 g).
- Erbsenprotein Schnetzel has 13% more protein (63 g vs 55 g).
- Proteína de guisante texturizado eco has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Proteína de guisante texturizado eco
Proteína de guisante procedente de agricultura ecológica controlada.
Erbsenprotein Schnetzel
100% Erbsen - protein.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Proteína de guisante texturizado eco or Erbsenprotein Schnetzel?
Overall, Proteína de guisante texturizado eco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Erbsenprotein Schnetzel has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Erbsenprotein Schnetzel has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.