Preparado de carne picada vacuno vs Torreznos
Overall, Preparado de carne picada vacuno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Preparado de carne picada vacuno
Torreznos
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Preparado de carne picada va... | Torreznos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 580 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.6 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 60 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Preparado de carne picada vacuno has 65% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 580 kcal).
- Preparado de carne picada vacuno has 63% less fat (14 g vs 38 g).
- Preparado de carne picada vacuno has 45% less saturated fat (6.6 g vs 12 g).
- Preparado de carne picada vacuno has 90% less salt (0.4 g vs 4 g).
- Torreznos has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Torreznos has 68% more protein (60 g vs 19 g).
- Preparado de carne picada vacuno has the better Nutri-Score.
- Torreznos is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Preparado de carne picada vacuno
Carne de vacuno (99%), aroma y antioxidantes (E-301 y E-331)
Torreznos
Careta de cerdo, grasa de cerdo, sal,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Preparado de carne picada vacuno or Torreznos?
Overall, Preparado de carne picada vacuno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Preparado de carne picada vacuno has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 580 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Preparado de carne picada vacuno has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.