Poutine Style vs Crumbly blue
Overall, Crumbly blue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poutine Style | Crumbly blue |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 304 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 23.6 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crumbly blue has 32% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Poutine Style
Eau, Huile de noix de coco raffinée (23%), Amidon modifié (Pomme de terre), Sel de mer, Protéine de pomme de terre, Citrate de calcium, Arôme végétalien naturel, Extrait d'olive et de baies de sorbier, Couleur (b-caroténe)
Crumbly blue
EAU, HUILE DE NOIX DE COCO (26%), AMIDON, FARINE DE RIZ, PROTÉINE DE LENTILLES, SEL MARIN, AMIDON MODIFIE, CORRECTEUR D'ACIDITE (ACIDE LACTIQUE), AROMES, EXTRAIT DE SPIRULINE, POUDRE DE SPIRULINE, EXTRAIT D'OLIVE, COLORANT (BETA-CAROTENE), VITAMINE B12.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poutine Style or Crumbly blue?
Overall, Crumbly blue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crumbly blue has fewer calories: 304 kcal versus 309 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Poutine Style has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.