Crumbly blue vs Tranches (comme du gouda)
Overall, Tranches (comme du gouda) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crumbly blue | Tranches (comme du gouda) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 304 kcal | 267 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 21.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 18.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tranches (comme du gouda) has 12% fewer calories (267 kcal vs 304 kcal).
- Tranches (comme du gouda) has 18% less fat (21.3 g vs 26 g).
- Tranches (comme du gouda) has 22% less saturated fat (18.7 g vs 24 g).
- Crumbly blue has 94% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Crumbly blue has 24% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.7 g).
- Tranches (comme du gouda) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Crumbly blue
EAU, HUILE DE NOIX DE COCO (26%), AMIDON, FARINE DE RIZ, PROTÉINE DE LENTILLES, SEL MARIN, AMIDON MODIFIE, CORRECTEUR D'ACIDITE (ACIDE LACTIQUE), AROMES, EXTRAIT DE SPIRULINE, POUDRE DE SPIRULINE, EXTRAIT D'OLIVE, COLORANT (BETA-CAROTENE), VITAMINE B12.
Tranches (comme du gouda)
eau, huile coco, amidon
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crumbly blue or Tranches (comme du gouda)?
Overall, Tranches (comme du gouda) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches (comme du gouda) has fewer calories: 267 kcal versus 304 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crumbly blue has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.