Comparison

Poule vermicelles vs 5 Minuten Terrine - Hühner-Nudeltopf

Overall, Poule vermicelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPoule vermicelles5 Minuten Terrine - Hühner-N...
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 19 kcal 63 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0.2 g 0.7 g
Protein 1.2 g 3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Poule vermicelles has 70% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 63 kcal).
  • Poule vermicelles has 89% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Poule vermicelles has no saturated fat, while 5 Minuten Terrine - Hühner-Nudeltopf has 0.3 g.
  • Poule vermicelles has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • 5 Minuten Terrine - Hühner-Nudeltopf has 71% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0.2 g).
  • 5 Minuten Terrine - Hühner-Nudeltopf has 60% more protein (3 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Only 5 Minuten Terrine - Hühner-Nudeltopf lists: Eggs, Gluten.

Ingredients

Poule vermicelles

Not available.

5 Minuten Terrine - Hühner-Nudeltopf

57 Hühner-Nudeltopf, 2% Gemüse Zutaten: 68,3% Nudeln (HARTWEIZENGRIESS, EIER), Stärke, 6,2% Hühnerfleisch, Aromen, Hefeextrakt, Jodsalz (Salz, Kaliumjodat), Zwiebeln, 1,3% Karotten, 0,6% Lauch, Petersilie, Hühnerfett, Kurkuma, Salz, Zucker, Antioxidations - mittel Rosmarinextrakt. Kann SELLERIE, MILCH, SENF und SOJA enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Poule vermicelles or 5 Minuten Terrine - Hühner-Nudeltopf?

Overall, Poule vermicelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Poule vermicelles has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Poule vermicelles has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons