Poule chocolat au lait vs Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio
Overall, Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Poule chocolat au lait
Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poule chocolat au lait | Moulages de Pâques, poule ch... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 573 kcal | 539 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 50 g | 44 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 7.7 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio has 13% less saturated fat (21 g vs 24 g).
- Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio has 12% less sugar (44 g vs 50 g).
Ingredients
Poule chocolat au lait
Sucre poudre de lait entier, pâte de cacao, arôme naturel de vanille émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_.
Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio
Sucre de canne*, pâtes de cacao*, beurre de cacao*, poudre de _lait_ entier*, émulsifiant: lécithine de _soja_*. *Bio Cacao : 58% minimum dans le chocolat noir. Cacao : 35% minimum dans le chocolat au lait. Peut contenir des traces de gluten, d'oeufs et de fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poule chocolat au lait or Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio?
Overall, Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio has fewer calories: 539 kcal versus 573 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Moulages de Pâques, poule chocolat noir bio has less sugar: 44 g versus 50 g per 100 g.