Poudre de pulpe de baobab vs Poudre de baobab
Overall, Poudre de baobab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poudre de pulpe de baobab | Poudre de baobab |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 173 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 31.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 45 g | — |
| Protein | 2 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poudre de baobab has 100% less sugar (0.1 g vs 31.1 g).
- Poudre de baobab has 33% more protein (3 g vs 2 g).
- Poudre de baobab has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Poudre de pulpe de baobab
Not available.
Poudre de baobab
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poudre de pulpe de baobab or Poudre de baobab?
Overall, Poudre de baobab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poudre de baobab has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Poudre de baobab has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 31.1 g per 100 g.