Poudre de pulpe de baobab vs Baobab en poudre
Overall, Baobab en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poudre de pulpe de baobab | Baobab en poudre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 173 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 31.1 g | 25.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 45 g | 44.3 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baobab en poudre has 13% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 173 kcal).
- Baobab en poudre has 90% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Baobab en poudre has 18% less sugar (25.4 g vs 31.1 g).
- Only Baobab en poudre lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Poudre de pulpe de baobab
Not available.
Baobab en poudre
10070 BIOLOGIQUES ORIGINE : Sénégal INFO ALLERGIES Ne contient aucune trace de gluten. Peuf contenir des traces de fruits à coque (amandes) et de graines de sésame.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poudre de pulpe de baobab or Baobab en poudre?
Overall, Baobab en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baobab en poudre has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Baobab en poudre has less sugar: 25.4 g versus 31.1 g per 100 g.