Comparison

Poudre de fruit bio de baobab vs Baobab en poudre

Overall, Baobab en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPoudre de fruit bio de baoba...Baobab en poudre
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group — 1
Calories 187 kcal 151 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 32 g 25.4 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 44.3 g
Protein 2.3 g 2.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSesame seeds

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Baobab en poudre has 19% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 187 kcal).
  • Baobab en poudre has 93% less fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Baobab en poudre has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Baobab en poudre has 21% less sugar (25.4 g vs 32 g).
  • Only Baobab en poudre lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Poudre de fruit bio de baobab

Not available.

Baobab en poudre

10070 BIOLOGIQUES ORIGINE : Sénégal INFO ALLERGIES Ne contient aucune trace de gluten. Peuf contenir des traces de fruits à coque (amandes) et de graines de sésame.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Poudre de fruit bio de baobab or Baobab en poudre?

Overall, Baobab en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Baobab en poudre has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baobab en poudre has less sugar: 25.4 g versus 32 g per 100 g.

More comparisons