Comparison

Poudre de caroube non sucrée vs Poudre de caroube

Overall, Poudre de caroube has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPoudre de caroube non sucréePoudre de caroube
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — —
Calories 354 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 4 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 38 g 29.8 g
Salt 0 g 0.3 g
Fiber 19 g 9 g
Protein 5 g 4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Poudre de caroube has 44% fewer calories (198 kcal vs 354 kcal).
  • Poudre de caroube has 90% less fat (0.4 g vs 4 g).
  • Poudre de caroube has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Poudre de caroube has 22% less sugar (29.8 g vs 38 g).
  • Poudre de caroube non sucrée has 53% more fiber (19 g vs 9 g).
  • Poudre de caroube non sucrée has 20% more protein (5 g vs 4 g).

Ingredients

Poudre de caroube non sucrée

POUDRE DE CAROUBE NON SUCREE Caroube en poudre Issu de l'agriculture biologique 4 La poudre de caroube de Sicile est une originale alternative au cacao, à utiliser en pâtisserie ou pour le petit dejeuner.

Poudre de caroube

carob powder (10070) {'ter opening close tightly, Store cool and dry. Fcr batch code/best before end: see packaging Carcbpulver Empfohlene Anwendung: Nehmen Sie 2-3 Tee!òffel Cercbpulver pro Dosis, Inhalt: 500 Gramm Zutaten: Carobpulver (100%) Ctrn t)ffnen Out und trockt:n Chargennummer/Mindestens hattbac bis S

FAQ

Which is healthier: Poudre de caroube non sucrée or Poudre de caroube?

Overall, Poudre de caroube has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Poudre de caroube has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Poudre de caroube has less sugar: 29.8 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons