Comparison

Pommes grenaille miel romarin vs Goose fat

Overall, Pommes grenaille miel romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPommes grenaille miel romari...Goose fat
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 2
Calories 151 kcal 900 kcal
Fat 5.6 g 100 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g 26 g
Sugars 2.9 g 0 g
Salt 0.6 g 0 g
Fiber 1.6 g 0 g
Protein 2.3 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pommes grenaille miel romarin has 83% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 900 kcal).
  • Pommes grenaille miel romarin has 94% less fat (5.6 g vs 100 g).
  • Pommes grenaille miel romarin has 88% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 26 g).
  • Goose fat has no sugar, while Pommes grenaille miel romarin has 2.9 g.
  • Goose fat has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Pommes grenaille miel romarin has 100% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Pommes grenaille miel romarin has 100% more protein (2.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Pommes grenaille miel romarin has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Goose fat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pommes grenaille miel romarin lists: Fish, Milk.

Ingredients

Pommes grenaille miel romarin

Pommes de terre préfrites 88% (pommes de terre, huile de tournesol), beurre 6,0%, eau, miel toutes fleurs 1,5%, romarin 0,70%, sel. Traces éventuelles de blé, céleri, soja, eufs, fruits à coque, poissons.

Goose fat

goose fat

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pommes grenaille miel romarin or Goose fat?

Overall, Pommes grenaille miel romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pommes grenaille miel romarin has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Goose fat has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons