Poire Williams à la vanille vs Rhubarbe cuite au chaudron
Overall, Poire Williams à la vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Poire Williams à la vanille
Rhubarbe cuite au chaudron
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poire Williams à la vanille | Rhubarbe cuite au chaudron |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 179 kcal | 179 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 44 g | 43 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poire Williams à la vanille has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Poire Williams à la vanille
Poires Williams 45%, sucre, pommes 15%, gélifiant : pectines, jus de citron concentré, gousses de vanille épuisées, arôme naturel de vanille 0,0002%.
Rhubarbe cuite au chaudron
rhubarbe 45%, sucre, pommes 20%, gélifiant : pectines, jus de citron concentré.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poire Williams à la vanille or Rhubarbe cuite au chaudron?
Overall, Poire Williams à la vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poire Williams à la vanille has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rhubarbe cuite au chaudron has less sugar: 43 g versus 44 g per 100 g.