Comparison
Pistazienmus vs Pistazienmus
Overall, Pistazienmus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pistazienmus | Pistazienmus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 557 kcal | 658 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 56 g |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pistazienmus has 15% fewer calories (557 kcal vs 658 kcal).
- Pistazienmus has 21% less fat (44 g vs 56 g).
- Pistazienmus has 17% less saturated fat (5 g vs 6 g).
- Pistazienmus has 29% less sugar (5 g vs 7 g).
- Pistazienmus has 40% more fiber (10 g vs 6 g).
Ingredients
Pistazienmus
100 % Pistazien
Pistazienmus
PiSTAZIENKERNE
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pistazienmus or Pistazienmus?
Overall, Pistazienmus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pistazienmus has fewer calories: 557 kcal versus 658 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pistazienmus has less sugar: 5 g versus 7 g per 100 g.