Comparison
Picpoul de pinet vs Pinot gris - 2016
Overall, Pinot gris - 2016 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Picpoul de pinet | Pinot gris - 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 256 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 15.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinot gris - 2016 has 71% fewer calories (73 kcal vs 256 kcal).
- Pinot gris - 2016 has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 20 g).
- Pinot gris - 2016 has 100% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 13 g).
- Picpoul de pinet has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 15.5 g).
- Pinot gris - 2016 has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
- Picpoul de pinet has 96% more protein (19 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Pinot gris - 2016 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Picpoul de pinet
Not available.
Pinot gris - 2016
raisins
FAQ
Which is healthier: Picpoul de pinet or Pinot gris - 2016?
Overall, Pinot gris - 2016 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinot gris - 2016 has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Picpoul de pinet has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.