Comparison
Picpoul de pinet vs Côtes du Rhône
Overall, Côtes du Rhône has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Picpoul de pinet | Côtes du Rhône |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 256 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côtes du Rhône has no calories, while Picpoul de pinet has 256 kcal.
- Côtes du Rhône has no fat, while Picpoul de pinet has 20 g.
- Côtes du Rhône has no salt, while Picpoul de pinet has 1.2 g.
- Picpoul de pinet has 100% more protein (19 g vs 0 g).
- Only Côtes du Rhône lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Picpoul de pinet
Not available.
Côtes du Rhône
vin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Picpoul de pinet or Côtes du Rhône?
Overall, Côtes du Rhône has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côtes du Rhône has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côtes du Rhône has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.