Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska vs Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung
Overall, Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska
Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Co... | Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 78 kcal | 106 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | — |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Fish, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has 26% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 106 kcal).
- Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has 54% less fat (2.6 g vs 5.7 g).
- Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has 73% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.6 g).
- Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung has no sugar, while Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has 1.6 g.
- Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has 99% more protein (3.5 g vs 0 g).
- Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska lists: Celery, Fish, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska
Pâtes* cuites (blé dur*), Tomates*, Carottes*, colin d'alaska, Riz* cuit, Eau de cuisson, Poireau*, Crème fraîche, céleri* oignons*, Huile de tournesol*, Jus de citron* à base de jus de citron* concentré, Aromates* (Persil*, Livèche*, Origan*), Amidon de riz*, Sel iodé, Antioxydants (Acide ascorbique, Extrait riche en tocophérol), *produits issus de l'agriculture biologique
Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska or Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung?
Overall, Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Petits Macaroni, Tomates, Colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 106 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.