Comparison

Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung vs Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G

Overall, Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio-Rindfleisch ZubereitungNutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 80...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — —
Calories 106 kcal 67 kcal
Fat 5.7 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0 g 7.2 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 0 g 1.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 37% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 106 kcal).
  • Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 39% less fat (3.5 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 50% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung has no sugar, while Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 7.2 g.
  • Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 98% more protein (1.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung

Not available.

Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung or Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G?

Overall, Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 106 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons