Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung vs Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G
Overall, Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung
Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung | Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 80... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 106 kcal | 67 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 7.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 37% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 106 kcal).
- Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 39% less fat (3.5 g vs 5.7 g).
- Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 50% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.6 g).
- Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung has no sugar, while Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 7.2 g.
- Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has 98% more protein (1.3 g vs 0 g).
- Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung
Not available.
Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung or Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G?
Overall, Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nutriben Natal 1 Pro Alfa 800G has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 106 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio-Rindfleisch Zubereitung has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.2 g per 100 g.