Petits chocolats vs Schweineschnitzel
Overall, Petits chocolats has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petits chocolats | Schweineschnitzel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 564 kcal | 574 kcal |
| Fat | 39.9 g | 39.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 24.8 g | 24.6 g |
| Sugars | 37 g | 43.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Petits chocolats has 15% less sugar (37 g vs 43.4 g).
- Only Petits chocolats lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Petits chocolats
Pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, _crème_ en poudre, émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_, cacao en poudre dégraissé, extrait de vanille.
Schweineschnitzel
Sucre, beurre de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, pâte de cacao, crème en poudre (_lait_), émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol , extrait de vanille,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petits chocolats or Schweineschnitzel?
Overall, Petits chocolats has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Petits chocolats has fewer calories: 564 kcal versus 574 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petits chocolats has less sugar: 37 g versus 43.4 g per 100 g.