Petits chocolats vs Assortiment de chocolats
Overall, Assortiment de chocolats has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petits chocolats | Assortiment de chocolats |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 564 kcal | 560 kcal |
| Fat | 39.9 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 24.8 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 37 g | 51 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 7 g | 6.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Assortiment de chocolats has 12% less fat (35 g vs 39.9 g).
- Assortiment de chocolats has 11% less saturated fat (22 g vs 24.8 g).
- Petits chocolats has 27% less sugar (37 g vs 51 g).
- Only Petits chocolats lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Petits chocolats
Pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, _crème_ en poudre, émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_, cacao en poudre dégraissé, extrait de vanille.
Assortiment de chocolats
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petits chocolats or Assortiment de chocolats?
Overall, Assortiment de chocolats has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Assortiment de chocolats has fewer calories: 560 kcal versus 564 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petits chocolats has less sugar: 37 g versus 51 g per 100 g.