Comparison
Persil Plat Bio vs Prezzemolo tritato
Overall, Prezzemolo tritato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Persil Plat Bio | Prezzemolo tritato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prezzemolo tritato has 26% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Prezzemolo tritato has 61% less fat (1.7 g vs 4.4 g).
- Persil Plat Bio is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Persil Plat Bio
Persil
Prezzemolo tritato
Prezzemolo, olio di semi di girasole 3%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Persil Plat Bio or Prezzemolo tritato?
Overall, Prezzemolo tritato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prezzemolo tritato has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Persil Plat Bio has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.