Comparison
Pelforth vs Spitfire
Overall, Spitfire has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Pelforth | Spitfire |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Spitfire has 26% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Spitfire has 60% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Pelforth
Not available.
Spitfire
ale beer
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pelforth or Spitfire?
Overall, Spitfire has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Spitfire has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spitfire has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1 g per 100 g.