Comparison
Pél!can Rouge vs Kriek Lambic
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pél!can Rouge | Kriek Lambic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 74 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kriek Lambic has 24% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 74 kcal).
- Kriek Lambic has no fat, while Pél!can Rouge has 0.6 g.
- Pél!can Rouge has 52% less sugar (2.5 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pél!can Rouge has 50% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.4 g).
- Only Kriek Lambic lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pél!can Rouge
Not available.
Kriek Lambic
Eau, jus de cerise à base de concentré (23%), malt d'_orge_, _blé_, sucre, cerises, arômes (dont cerise), houblon, extraits de houblon.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pél!can Rouge or Kriek Lambic?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kriek Lambic has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 74 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pél!can Rouge has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.