Kriek Lambic vs Radler
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Kriek Lambic | Radler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 56 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.2 g | 6.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Radler has 25% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 56 kcal).
- Kriek Lambic has 16% less sugar (5.2 g vs 6.2 g).
Ingredients
Kriek Lambic
Eau, jus de cerise à base de concentré (23%), malt d'_orge_, _blé_, sucre, cerises, arômes (dont cerise), houblon, extraits de houblon.
Radler
Agua, cerveza (agua, malta de cebada, maíz, lúpulo), azúcar, zumos de limón (2,7%) y naranja (1,9%) a partir de concentrado, dióxido de carbono, zumo de lima (0,4%) a partir de concentrado, extracto de limón concentrado, aroma natural de limón con otros aromas naturales, estabilizador: goma garrofín, conservante: sorbato potásico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kriek Lambic or Radler?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Radler has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kriek Lambic has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.