Comparison

Paté ibérico vs Paté de cerdo tapa negra

Overall, Paté de cerdo tapa negra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPaté ibéricoPaté de cerdo tapa negra
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 361 kcal 273 kcal
Fat 35.9 g 24 g
Saturated fat 14.1 g 8.7 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 8.6 g 12 g
Additives24
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Paté de cerdo tapa negra has 24% fewer calories (273 kcal vs 361 kcal).
  • Paté de cerdo tapa negra has 33% less fat (24 g vs 35.9 g).
  • Paté de cerdo tapa negra has 38% less saturated fat (8.7 g vs 14.1 g).
  • Paté de cerdo tapa negra has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Paté de cerdo tapa negra has 17% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Paté de cerdo tapa negra has 28% more protein (12 g vs 8.6 g).
  • Paté de cerdo tapa negra has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Paté ibérico lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Paté ibérico

Carne de higado de cerdo ibérico (65%), leche descremada, sal, especias, aromas, antioxidante (ascorbato sódico), conservador (nitrito sódico).

Paté de cerdo tapa negra

Carne, hígado 27%, tocino y proteína de cerdo, agua, harina de arroz, fibra vegetal, sal, estabilizantes (tripolifosfato sódico, carragenanos), potenciador del sabor (glutamato de sodio), azúcar, especias, aromas, conservador (nitrito sódico),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Paté ibérico or Paté de cerdo tapa negra?

Overall, Paté de cerdo tapa negra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Paté de cerdo tapa negra has fewer calories: 273 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Paté de cerdo tapa negra has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons