Parówki z szynki vs Parówki 100% z kurczaka
Overall, Parówki 100% z kurczaka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parówki z szynki | Parówki 100% z kurczaka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 276 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.6 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Parówki 100% z kurczaka has 27% fewer calories (202 kcal vs 276 kcal).
- Parówki 100% z kurczaka has 38% less fat (15 g vs 24 g).
- Parówki 100% z kurczaka has 49% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 9.6 g).
- Parówki z szynki has 18% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.2 g).
- Parówki 100% z kurczaka has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
- Parówki 100% z kurczaka has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Parówki 100% z kurczaka lists: Celery, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Parówki z szynki
mięso wieprzowe z szynki, sól, przyprawy, ekstrakty przypraw, aromaty naturalne, glukoza, białko wieprzowe kolagenowe, cukier.
Parówki 100% z kurczaka
Mięso z kurczaka (100 g produktu wytworzono ze 100 g mięsa z kurczaka), sól, aromaty, glukoza, przyprawy, kultury bakterii startowych. Może zawierać zboża zawierające gluten, soję, mleko (łącznie z laktozą), seler, gorczycę.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parówki z szynki or Parówki 100% z kurczaka?
Overall, Parówki 100% z kurczaka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Parówki 100% z kurczaka has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 276 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Parówki z szynki has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.