Panzani sauce provencale 400g f12 vs Panzani sce provencale 425g
Overall, Panzani sauce provencale 400g f12 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Panzani sauce provencale 400g f12
Panzani sce provencale 425g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panzani sauce provencale 400... | Panzani sce provencale 425g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 48 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 5.7 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panzani sauce provencale 400g f12 has 31% more fiber (1.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Panzani sauce provencale 400g f12 has 20% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Panzani sauce provencale 400g f12
Pulpe de tomates fraîches avec morceaux 76% (tomates 53%, purée de tomates), purée de tomates 8%, carottes 5%, oignons 4%, sucre, huile de tournesol, sel, amidon, herbes de Provence 0,4%, persil, arômes naturels d'herbes, extrait d'oignon.
Panzani sce provencale 425g
Pulpe de tomates avec morceaux 73% (tomates 51%, purée de tomates), purée de tomates 8%, carottes 5%, oignons 4%, sucre, huile de tournesol, sel, amidon, herbes de Provence 0,4%, persil, arômes naturels d'herbes, extrait d'oignon.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panzani sauce provencale 400g f12 or Panzani sce provencale 425g?
Overall, Panzani sauce provencale 400g f12 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panzani sce provencale 425g has fewer calories: 48 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panzani sce provencale 425g has less sugar: 5.3 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.