Panna cotta sur lit de fruits rouges vs Panna cotta fruits rouges
Overall, Panna cotta fruits rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Panna cotta sur lit de fruits rouges
Panna cotta fruits rouges
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna cotta sur lit de fruit... | Panna cotta fruits rouges |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 121 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 6 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.9 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 12.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 2.6 g |
| Additives | 7 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta fruits rouges has 25% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 161 kcal).
- Panna cotta fruits rouges has 33% less fat (6 g vs 8.9 g).
- Panna cotta fruits rouges has 64% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 5.9 g).
- Panna cotta fruits rouges has 21% less sugar (12.7 g vs 16 g).
- Panna cotta fruits rouges has 15% more protein (2.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Panna cotta fruits rouges has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Panna cotta sur lit de fruits rouges
_lait_ écrémé 55%, _crème_ 23%, préparation Fruits rouges (sirop de glucose - fructose, fruits 4.4% (fraise, mûre, myrtille, framboise), sucre, amidons modifié de pomme de terre, correcteur d'acidité (citrate de sodium), stabilisants (gomme xanthane, alginate de sodium), conservateur de fruit (sorbate de potassium), arômes, colorant (carmin)), sucre, fécule de pomme de terre, épaississants (carraghénanes, petines), poudr de _lait_ écrémé, arôme vanille
Panna cotta fruits rouges
Panna cotta 88% (lait entier, crème liquide, sucre de canne, manioc, gélifiant : agar-agar), nappage fruit 12% (purées (framboise 3,3%, myrtille sauvage 2,2%), sucre de canne, jus de citron concentré, gélifiant : agar-agar).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna cotta sur lit de fruits rouges or Panna cotta fruits rouges?
Overall, Panna cotta fruits rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta fruits rouges has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna cotta fruits rouges has less sugar: 12.7 g versus 16 g per 100 g.