Panna cotta caramelo vs Panna Cotta Caramel Sale
Overall, Panna cotta caramelo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Panna cotta caramelo
Panna Cotta Caramel Sale
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna cotta caramelo | Panna Cotta Caramel Sale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 17.5 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta caramelo has 48% fewer calories (169 kcal vs 323 kcal).
- Panna cotta caramelo has 64% less fat (9 g vs 25 g).
- Panna cotta caramelo has 65% less saturated fat (6 g vs 17 g).
- Panna cotta caramelo has 20% less sugar (17.5 g vs 22 g).
- Panna cotta caramelo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Panna cotta caramelo lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Panna cotta caramelo
Lait écrémé (56 %), crème (23 %), sucre, caramel (8,9 %)(sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose de blé, eau, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, épaississants : carraghénanes, pectines), fécule de pomme de terre, arôme.
Panna Cotta Caramel Sale
Panacotta 76% (creme 67%, sucre de canne, gélifiant : gélatine bovine, vanille gousse), caramel 24% (sucre de canne, fleur de sel, crème gélifiant: gélatine bovine), conservateur (sorbate de potassium) Lait d'origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna cotta caramelo or Panna Cotta Caramel Sale?
Overall, Panna cotta caramelo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta caramelo has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 323 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna cotta caramelo has less sugar: 17.5 g versus 22 g per 100 g.