Comparison

Palmitos en Rodajas vs Piña natural en su jugo sin azúcar añadido

Overall, Palmitos en Rodajas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPalmitos en RodajasPiña natural en su jugo sin...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — —
Calories 35 kcal 63 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 12 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 3.1 g 0.4 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Palmitos en Rodajas has 45% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 63 kcal).
  • Palmitos en Rodajas has no sugar, while Piña natural en su jugo sin azúcar añadido has 12 g.
  • Piña natural en su jugo sin azúcar añadido has no salt, while Palmitos en Rodajas has 0.5 g.
  • Palmitos en Rodajas has 87% more protein (3.1 g vs 0.4 g).

Ingredients

Palmitos en Rodajas

Not available.

Piña natural en su jugo sin azúcar añadido

NORVI PIÑA EN RODAJAS EN SU JUGO ANANAS EM RODELAS EM SUMO-PINEAFPLE SuENUE ngredientes: Piña en rodajas,jugo de piñayacduarte gredientes: Ananás em rodelas, sumo de arast de acidez: E-330. ngredients: Pineapple sices, pineapple juice and acidian Valores nutricion medios (por cada 100g Energia.oeans anni Grasas. reses 188 kJ/45 ka *samgeuussanuna****** *****sassweee de las cuales saturadas.n idratos de carbono.. e los cuales azúcares.. aseressseeseseseetane roteinas oeas Sa ssrgans 0050

FAQ

Which is healthier: Palmitos en Rodajas or Piña natural en su jugo sin azúcar añadido?

Overall, Palmitos en Rodajas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Palmitos en Rodajas has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Palmitos en Rodajas has less sugar: 0 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons