Comparison

Palette d'Alsace à la Diable Rôtie vs Palette à la Diable

Overall, Palette à la Diable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPalette d'Alsace à la Diable...Palette à la Diable
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 167 kcal 126 kcal
Fat 8.1 g 6.7 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 2.6 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.6 g 2 g
Protein 22.9 g 14 g
Additives40
AllergensGluten, Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, DISULFITE DE POTASSIUMNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Palette à la Diable has 24% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 167 kcal).
  • Palette à la Diable has 17% less fat (6.7 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Palette à la Diable has 20% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Palette d'Alsace à la Diable Rôtie has 20% less salt (1.6 g vs 2 g).
  • Palette d'Alsace à la Diable Rôtie has 39% more protein (22.9 g vs 14 g).
  • Only Palette d'Alsace à la Diable Rôtie lists: Gluten, Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, DISULFITE DE POTASSIUM.

Ingredients

Palette d'Alsace à la Diable Rôtie

Palette de porc sans os traitée en salaison avec de l'eau de source, Sauce _moutarde_ (10% env.) : eau, graines de moutarde brunes, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, acide citrique, _DISULFITE DE POTASSIUM_. Crépines de porc. sel. Anti-oxydant: ascorbate de sodium, dextrose de _blé_. Conservateur: nitrite de sodium.

Palette à la Diable

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Palette d'Alsace à la Diable Rôtie or Palette à la Diable?

Overall, Palette à la Diable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Palette à la Diable has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Palette d'Alsace à la Diable Rôtie has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons