Comparison

Pain De Viande Poulet vs Bonroll con spinaci

Overall, Bonroll con spinaci has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPain De Viande PouletBonroll con spinaci
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 224 kcal 220 kcal
Fat 15 g 16 g
Saturated fat 4.8 g 6.5 g
Sugars 1.5 g 0.8 g
Salt 2 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 14 g 14 g
Additives21
AllergensEggs, Gluten, SoybeansEggs, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pain De Viande Poulet has 26% less saturated fat (4.8 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Bonroll con spinaci has 47% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Bonroll con spinaci has 20% less salt (1.6 g vs 2 g).
  • Only Pain De Viande Poulet lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
  • Only Bonroll con spinaci lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Pain De Viande Poulet

Viande de poulet88%, eau, chapelure (farine de blé), farine (blě, seigle, gluten, œufs, soja), sel, amidon de blé, herbes (marjolaine), 3 % épices (poivre), arôme (contient orge, soja), dextrose, sirop de glucose, maltodextriné, stabilisants (di - tri-et polyphosphates), antioxidants (acide ascorbique, ascorbáte de sodium), 3%

Bonroll con spinaci

Carne di pollo e tacchino 49%. Lardello di suino, spinaci 10%, uova 7%. acqua, granuli di patata, formaggio 2.7% (Latte). farina di mais, sale, amido di patata, burro (Latte). proteine del latte. piante aromatiche, antiossidanti: acido ascorbico, aromi naturali.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pain De Viande Poulet or Bonroll con spinaci?

Overall, Bonroll con spinaci has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bonroll con spinaci has fewer calories: 220 kcal versus 224 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bonroll con spinaci has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons