Ovomaltine vs Nes Milo 200Gm
Overall, Nes Milo 200Gm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ovomaltine | Nes Milo 200Gm |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 398 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 15.5 g | 9.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 6.5 g |
| Sugars | 42 g | 44 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nes Milo 200Gm has 39% less fat (9.5 g vs 15.5 g).
- Ovomaltine has no salt, while Nes Milo 200Gm has 0.4 g.
- Nes Milo 200Gm has 30% more fiber (4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Nes Milo 200Gm has 43% more protein (12.5 g vs 7.1 g).
- Only Nes Milo 200Gm lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Ovomaltine
Extrait de malt d'orge (53%), sucre, sirop de glucose, lait entier en poudre, huile D palmiste hydrogénée, lactosérum en poudre, poudre de cacao, 5 mineraux( calcium, magnésium, phosphore, fer, zinc),caséinate de sodium, sel, émulsifiant, (E471, E472e), hydrogénophosphate dipotassique, 10 vitamines(niacine, A, B5, E, D, B1,B6,B2,acide folique, B12), tripolyphosphate de sodium, vanilline,
Nes Milo 200Gm
Extract of Malt Barley or Malt Barley And Rice (Total Extract 38%), Milk Solids, Sugar, Cocoa, Choc Malt Blend, Minerals (Calcium, Iron), Maltodextrin (Corn), Vitamins (C, B3, B6, B2, D, B12), Emulsifier (Soy Lecithin).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ovomaltine or Nes Milo 200Gm?
Overall, Nes Milo 200Gm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ovomaltine has fewer calories: 398 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ovomaltine has less sugar: 42 g versus 44 g per 100 g.