Ovomaltine vs Nes Milo 200Gm
Overall, Nes Milo 200Gm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ovomaltine | Nes Milo 200Gm |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 376 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 9.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 6.5 g |
| Sugars | 51.1 g | 44 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 9.5 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ovomaltine has 80% less fat (1.9 g vs 9.5 g).
- Ovomaltine has 86% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 6.5 g).
- Nes Milo 200Gm has 14% less sugar (44 g vs 51.1 g).
- Nes Milo 200Gm has 100% more fiber (4 g vs 0 g).
- Nes Milo 200Gm has 24% more protein (12.5 g vs 9.5 g).
- Only Nes Milo 200Gm lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Ovomaltine
Extrait de malte d’orge E 51%, lait écrémé concentré, lactosérum concentré (lait), cacao maigre en poudre 13%, sucre, fructose, minéraux de magnésium, phosphate de calcium), huile de colza, vitamines (E, C, Thiamine : B1, riboflavine, B2, niacine : PP, B8,, acide pantothenique B6), sel, arôme (vanilline
Nes Milo 200Gm
Extract of Malt Barley or Malt Barley And Rice (Total Extract 38%), Milk Solids, Sugar, Cocoa, Choc Malt Blend, Minerals (Calcium, Iron), Maltodextrin (Corn), Vitamins (C, B3, B6, B2, D, B12), Emulsifier (Soy Lecithin).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ovomaltine or Nes Milo 200Gm?
Overall, Nes Milo 200Gm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ovomaltine has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nes Milo 200Gm has less sugar: 44 g versus 51.1 g per 100 g.