Oeufs praliné vs Kinder Surprise
Overall, Kinder Surprise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oeufs praliné | Kinder Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 547 kcal | 561 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 34.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 22.9 g |
| Sugars | 59 g | 52.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kinder Surprise has 11% less sugar (52.3 g vs 59 g).
- Kinder Surprise has 100% more fiber (2.9 g vs 0 g).
- Kinder Surprise has 55% more protein (8.4 g vs 3.8 g).
- Only Oeufs praliné lists: Gluten.
- Only Kinder Surprise lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Oeufs praliné
Sucre, graisses végétales [palme, palmiste, coprah], poudre de LAIT entier, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, LACTOSERUM en poudre, LACTOSE, cacao maigre en poudre, praliné 1% [pâte de NOISETTES, sucre], émulsifiants : lécithine - E476, poudre de LAIT écrémé, matière grasse de LAIT anhydre, farine de riz, farine de BLE, huile végétale [palme], GLUTEN de BLE, malt de BLE, dextrose, sel, arômes.
Kinder Surprise
milk chocolate (sugar, whole milk powder, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, emulsifier: lecithins (soy), vanillin), skimmed milk powder, sugar, vegetable fat (palm, shea), concentrated butter, emulsifier: lecithins (soy), vanillin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oeufs praliné or Kinder Surprise?
Overall, Kinder Surprise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oeufs praliné has fewer calories: 547 kcal versus 561 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kinder Surprise has less sugar: 52.3 g versus 59 g per 100 g.