Odd Pods vs Crunchy Peas smoked paprika
Overall, Odd Pods has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Odd Pods | Crunchy Peas smoked paprika |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 165 kcal | 416 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 13.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 6.7 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 9.7 g | 11.9 g |
| Protein | 10.6 g | 14.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Odd Pods has 60% fewer calories (165 kcal vs 416 kcal).
- Odd Pods has 77% less fat (3 g vs 13.3 g).
- Odd Pods has 61% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Odd Pods has 81% less sugar (1.3 g vs 6.7 g).
- Odd Pods has 67% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Crunchy Peas smoked paprika has 18% more fiber (11.9 g vs 9.7 g).
- Crunchy Peas smoked paprika has 27% more protein (14.6 g vs 10.6 g).
- Odd Pods is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Crunchy Peas smoked paprika lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Odd Pods
vegetable stock
Crunchy Peas smoked paprika
60% erwten, zonnebloemolie, zetmeel, tarwebloem, inuline, gerookte paprikakruidenmix (uienpoeder, zout, zeezout, 0,3% paprikapoeder, 0,3% gerookte paprikapoeder, rijstebloem, natuurlijk aroma, champignonpoeder, extract van paprika, knoflookpoeder, voedingszuur (citroenzuur), maltodextrine, gerookte maltodextrine, gerookt zout suiker, rijsmiddel (ammoniumcarbonaten).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Odd Pods or Crunchy Peas smoked paprika?
Overall, Odd Pods has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Odd Pods has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 416 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Odd Pods has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.