Nougat de Montélilar vs Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema
Overall, Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nougat de Montélilar
Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nougat de Montélilar | Turrón Blando, Calidad supre... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 446 kcal | 557 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 39 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 58 g | 27 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 7 g |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Eggs, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nougat de Montélilar has 20% fewer calories (446 kcal vs 557 kcal).
- Nougat de Montélilar has 59% less fat (16 g vs 39 g).
- Nougat de Montélilar has 74% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 5 g).
- Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema has 53% less sugar (27 g vs 58 g).
- Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema has 54% more protein (18 g vs 8.2 g).
- Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Nougat de Montélilar
sucre,AMANDES 30% miel 19%,sirop de glucose,pain azyme(ffécule de pomme de terre, eau),albumine d'CEUF,aróma naturel de vanille. Présence possible d'autres frults à coque.
Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema
_Amande_ (67%), miel (16,4%), sucre, stabilisateur : E-471, blanc d'_œuf_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nougat de Montélilar or Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema?
Overall, Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nougat de Montélilar has fewer calories: 446 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Turrón Blando, Calidad suprema has less sugar: 27 g versus 58 g per 100 g.