Nescafé Vainilla Latte vs Milo PRO
Overall, Milo PRO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nescafé Vainilla Latte | Milo PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 414 kcal | 362 kcal |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 50.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 24.5 g |
| Additives | 7 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milo PRO has 13% fewer calories (362 kcal vs 414 kcal).
- Milo PRO has 70% less fat (3.5 g vs 11.6 g).
- Milo PRO has 85% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 10.5 g).
- Milo PRO has 91% less sugar (4.5 g vs 50.2 g).
- Milo PRO has 51% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Nescafé Vainilla Latte has 100% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0 g).
- Milo PRO has 68% more protein (24.5 g vs 7.9 g).
- Milo PRO has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Milo PRO lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Nescafé Vainilla Latte
Azúcar, jarabe de glucosa, leche descremada en polvo, aceite vegetal (palm), café instantáneo en polvo, maltodextrina, caseinato de sodio, reguladores de acidez (fosfato dipotásico, citrato sódico), fosfato tricálcico, sal, antiaglomerante (dióxido de silicio), saborizante idéntico al natural. CONTIENE LECHE.
Milo PRO
Leche, Extracto de malta (de cebada), Azúcar, Cacao, Proteína de leche, Emulsionante (lecitina de soya), Niacina, D3, B6, B2, B1
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nescafé Vainilla Latte or Milo PRO?
Overall, Milo PRO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milo PRO has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 414 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milo PRO has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 50.2 g per 100 g.