Naměkko plněné vs Quinoa e riso
Overall, Naměkko plněné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Naměkko plněné | Quinoa e riso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 408 kcal | 547 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 37 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 22 g | 36 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.9 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Naměkko plněné has 25% fewer calories (408 kcal vs 547 kcal).
- Naměkko plněné has 59% less fat (15 g vs 37 g).
- Naměkko plněné has 91% less saturated fat (2 g vs 23 g).
- Naměkko plněné has 39% less sugar (22 g vs 36 g).
- Quinoa e riso has no salt, while Naměkko plněné has 0.6 g.
- Quinoa e riso has 23% more fiber (9 g vs 6.9 g).
- Quinoa e riso has 24% more protein (7 g vs 5.3 g).
- Naměkko plněné has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Quinoa e riso lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Naměkko plněné
Not available.
Quinoa e riso
eali Cioccolato fondente extra con crispies alla quinoa e riso da Agricoltura Ingredienti da agricoltura biologica: "Pasta di cacao-*Zucchero integrale di canna (27%)-- za ato cacao-"Zucchero di canna-Crispies alla quinoa e riso (3%) (riso-quinoa-zucchero di c Può contenere tracce di latte, nocciole, mandorle. da Cacao: 61% minimo nel cioccolato
FAQ
Which is healthier: Naměkko plněné or Quinoa e riso?
Overall, Naměkko plněné has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Naměkko plněné has fewer calories: 408 kcal versus 547 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Naměkko plněné has less sugar: 22 g versus 36 g per 100 g.